Mugsy: 2001-2014
10 years ago
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
One humble attempt at navigating through the webs of deception in this world.
About Me
- JMG
- I have a wonderful husband and three adorable dogs.
Blog Friends
-
-
Justifiable theft?14 years ago
-
Mortgage/Refinance Recommendation15 years ago
-
Good Blogs
Good Free Stuff
Blog Archive
-
▼
2006
(109)
-
▼
July
(17)
- The Rich Get Richer
- I'm Thinking About You, Mrs. Mackey
- Scammer Round Two
- I Wasn't Born Yesterday, Sucka!
- Do Huggies Come in Adult Sizes?
- My Opinion About a Dumb Question
- Dumb Question
- If we can't get any better candidates than this, I...
- Firstfruits
- Perpetuating Suffering is Never Excusable
- A Cold Supper
- Disgusting
- Vacation Bible School Redux
- Van Hilleary must still be mad about losing the g...
- In Search of Brisket
- God Was at the Lake
- Don't Make a Federal Case Out of Homeowner Associa...
-
▼
July
(17)
8 comments:
Why are we reluctant to execute a death row inmate when there is a chance of innocence, yet we have no problem with abortion when we have yet to establish at what point life begins? Should we err on the side of safety in both instances in order to preserve life?
Perhaps we could compromise by using only Iraqi embryos for stem cell research.
Instead of trying to disqualify the question, why don't you try answering it?
Collateral damage is just that - the unfortunate and unintended consequences of taking up arms.
Using an embryo for medical research when no one has defined when life begins is an intentional action taken against an organism that may or may not be "life".
Anonymous (#1), perhaps erring on the side of life, as our president has said in the past, is a good idea.
Homelessguy, if I had wanted to disqualify the question, I wouldn't have bothered asking it. Perhaps you have the answer?
Because we would rather spend time debating an unanswerable question (exact moment of life) vs. taking responsibility for our decisions and actions (waging war)?
thehomelessguy: maybe JMG has an answer but what to hear our's unbiased before sharing hers?
Tony
Actually, Bush allows federally funded research on a limited number of useless stem cell lines with damaged DNA.
Post a Comment